On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:47:38PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > On 11/25/2013 05:41 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > >Adding the lookup table in first patch and then changing the driver in > >the second creates a point to the history where this driver stops > >working on this platform, which is something I'm not willing to do. > > Does it? If you just add a lookup table and keep using the > integer-based GPIO interface, then your lookup table will not be > used by anyone and will basically be a no-op. Then you can switch to > the GPIO descriptor interface and take advantage of the lookup > table. Unless I missed something there should not be any point that > breaks in the git history. > > (to be clear: the first patch should *only* contain the lookup > table, and the second be a merge of the current patches 1 and 3 of > this series.) OK, I agree. If I don't remove the old gpio numbers in in the first patch, there is no problem. We can do this with the two patches. Thanks, -- heikki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
