Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi_gpio.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now that all users of acpi_gpio.h have been moved to user either the GPIO

s/user/use

> descriptor interface or to the internal gpiolib.h we can get rid of

gpiolib.h will also need to be renamed if you follow my suggestion below.

> acpi_gpio.h entirely.
>
> Once this is done the only interface to get GPIOs to drivers enumerated
> from ACPI namespace is the descriptor based interface.

Oh, do I like this. :)

>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c |  4 +++-
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      |  1 -
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h      | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/acpi_gpio.h   | 45 ---------------------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 include/linux/acpi_gpio.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> index cb2da66fbbfe..6c158d9a6efa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> @@ -12,11 +12,13 @@
>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>
> +#include "gpiolib.h"
> +
>  struct acpi_gpio_evt_pin {
>         struct list_head node;
>         acpi_handle *evt_handle;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 70abccf0d144..a6b82413c290 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/idr.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> index 2ed23ab8298c..82be586c1f90 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> @@ -12,12 +12,35 @@
>  #ifndef GPIOLIB_H
>  #define GPIOLIB_H
>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * struct acpi_gpio_info - ACPI GPIO specific information
> + * @gpioint: if %true this GPIO is of type GpioInt otherwise type is GpioIo
> + * @active_low: in case of @gpioint, the pin is active low
> + */
> +struct acpi_gpio_info {
> +       bool gpioint;
> +       bool active_low;
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  void acpi_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip);
>  void acpi_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip);
> +
> +struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
> +                                         struct acpi_gpio_info *info);
>  #else
>  static inline void acpi_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip) { }
>  static inline void acpi_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip) { }
> +
> +static inline struct gpio_desc *
> +acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
> +                       struct acpi_gpio_info *info)
> +{
> +       return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
> +}
>  #endif

Since this header contains purely ACPI-related declarations so far, I wonder
if it should not be renamed acpi.h?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux