On Saturday, November 09, 2013 06:36:18 PM al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Al Stone <ahs3@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Make sure we are not in HW reduced mode when we rely on the the > P_LVL2_LAT or P_LVL3_LAT (c2_latency, c3_latency) values from the > FADT. > > Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > index 28079a6..e2bd0bf 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c > @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_power_info(struct acpi_processor *pr) > memset(pr->power.states, 0, sizeof(pr->power.states)); > > result = acpi_processor_get_power_info_cst(pr); > - if (result == -ENODEV) > + if (!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware && (result == -ENODEV)) > result = acpi_processor_get_power_info_fadt(pr); Wouldn't it be better to make acpi_processor_get_power_info_fadt() check acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware ? > > if (result) > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
