On 10/22/2013 12:33 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
But yes, this is possible and it would make it all even cleaner
and simpler by simply not needing the reg/dereg interfaces for
mce_ext_err_print but adding it to the chain.
So this is on top of the 9 patch series (using the V4 that Chen Gong
posted for part 4/9 and V3 for all the others). Obviously it should
be folded back into the series if we go this way.
It's a bit simplistic right now - the registered function just returns
NOTIFY_DONE in all cases so it will not disturb processing by any other
registered functions - we can make it smarter later.
Looks good. We obviously need to ensure this gets called before EDAC, if
at all. The other question is w.r.t conflicts with EDAC, which we can
re-visit as part of the discussions around a new trace event.
Thanks,
Naveen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
