On 10/16/2013 6:53 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi, > > The first patches prepare the driver for the support. The last patch > can then add the support quite easily. With these patches, adding DT > support later will be quite straight forward if someone needs it. > > > Heikki Krogerus (5): > net: rfkill: gpio: convert to resource managed allocation > net: rfkill: gpio: clean up clock handling > net: rfkill: gpio: spinlock-safe GPIO access > net: rfkill: gpio: prepare for DT and ACPI support > net: rfkill: gpio: add ACPI support > > net/rfkill/Kconfig | 2 +- > net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-) > Strictly speaking, duplicating the pdata fields into the rfkill_gpio_data structure isn't really necessary. Many drivers simply have the dt parsing or in this case ACPI parsing generate a platform_data structure which would then be saved in the rfkill_gpio_data structure. In this case, since it is only a few fields, I am not too worried and I am fine either way. Acked-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@xxxxxxxxxx> -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
