On Friday, October 11, 2013 05:49:46 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> +Rafael
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:17:49PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > There is a minor fault about ACPI enumerated I2C devices with their modalias
> > attribute. Now modalias is set by device instance not by hardware ID.
> > For example "i2c:INTABCD:00", "i2c:INTABCD:01" etc.
>
> I think that this is intentional. We don't want that the i2c modalias
> matches with the ACPI device (like with the i2c:INTABCD). Instead use ACPI
> IDs that are added to the driver to match with the ACPI device.
Well, I'm not really sure this was intentional, but I wonder how other bus
types work in that respect?
> > This means each device instance gets different modalias which does match
> > with generated modules.alias. Currently this is not problem as matching can
> > happen also with "acpi:INTABCD" modalias.
> >
> > Fix this by using ACPI hardware ID.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Generated on top of v3.12-rc4-29-g0e7a3ed.
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > index 29d3f04..6dd0c53 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > @@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_i2c_add_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 level,
> > if (ret < 0 || !info.addr)
> > return AE_OK;
> >
> > - strlcpy(info.type, dev_name(&adev->dev), sizeof(info.type));
> > + strlcpy(info.type, acpi_device_hid(adev), sizeof(info.type));
> > if (!i2c_new_device(adapter, &info)) {
> > dev_err(&adapter->dev,
> > "failed to add I2C device %s from ACPI\n",
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
