On 10/04/2013 09:55 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
You're misreading my suggestion. What I'm saying is that it seems like
it might be useful to have dev_name() return the ACPI name - this would
mean that everything, including all the dev_ prints, would use the same
name which would then become stable and tied to hardware.
I see. Indeed, this sounds a better idea. At quick look is even more simple.
Well, this is slightly ambiguous. What exactly do you mean by "ACPI names"?
Ah, yes. What I meant as ACPI name was the <bus_id:instance> based ACPI
device name/object (or what is the correct terminology), not the
hardware ID.
--
Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
