Hello tejun,
On 09/23/2013 11:57 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:30:55PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE
>> + if (movablenode_enable_srat) {
>> + /*
>> + * When ACPI SRAT is parsed, which is done in initmem_init(),
>> + * set memblock back to the default behavior.
>> + */
>> + memblock_set_current_direction(MEMBLOCK_DIRECTION_DEFAULT);
>> + }
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE */
>
> It's kinda weird to have ifdef around the above when all the actual
> code would be compiled and linked regardless of the above ifdef.
> Wouldn't it make more sense to conditionalize
> memblock_direction_bottom_up() so that it's constant false to allow
> the compiler to drop unnecessary code?
you mean we define memblock_set_bottom_up and memblock_bottom_up like below:
#ifdef CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE
void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable)
{
/* do something */
}
bool memblock_bottom_up()
{
return direction == bottom_up;
}
#else
void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable)
{
/* empty */
}
bool memblock_bottom_up()
{
return false;
}
#endif
right?
thanks.
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Thanks.
Zhang Yanfei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
