On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:31:52AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:16:11PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:59:50AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Accessing the bus isn't an issue for I2C outside of ACPI, the power > > > management of the device is totally disassociated from the bus and the > > > controller is responsible for ensuring it is available during transfers. > > > Yes, but since we want to support ACPI as well, we must make sure that the > > adapter (and the associated controller) is available when client ->probe() > > is called. > > Right, but this probably needs to be highlighted more since it's a very > surprising thing for I2C and is causing confusion. By highlighted more, do you mean something like adding a comment in the code about this or? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
