Re: [PATCH] ACPI/Thermal: Add check of "_TZD" availability and evaluating result

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rafael:
           Thanks for review.

2013/8/24 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>:
> On Saturday, August 24, 2013 05:01:28 PM tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Some machines don't provide _TZD. So add check of "_TZD" availability
>> before doing futher operations. This patch also adds the check of
>> evaluating result.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
>> index 09f9340..6809fbd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
>> @@ -492,11 +492,12 @@ static int acpi_thermal_trips_update(struct acpi_thermal *tz, int flag)
>>                       break;
>>       }
>>
>> -     if (flag & ACPI_TRIPS_DEVICES) {
>> +     if ((flag & ACPI_TRIPS_DEVICES)
>> +                     && acpi_has_method(tz->device->handle, "_TZD")) {
>
> Please arrange the whitespace here like this:
>
>         if ((flag & ACPI_TRIPS_DEVICES)
>             && acpi_has_method(tz->device->handle, "_TZD")) {
>

Ok. I will update.

>
>>               memset(&devices, 0, sizeof(struct acpi_handle_list));
>>               status = acpi_evaluate_reference(tz->device->handle, "_TZD",
>>                                               NULL, &devices);
>> -             if (memcmp(&tz->devices, &devices,
>> +             if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && memcmp(&tz->devices, &devices,
>>                               sizeof(struct acpi_handle_list))) {
>
> I wonder why you can't use "tz->device == devices" here instead of the memcmp?

After changing like this, compiling failed with the following warning.

drivers/acpi/thermal.c: In function 'acpi_thermal_trips_update':
drivers/acpi/thermal.c:500:43: error: invalid operands to binary ==
(have 'struct acpi_handle_list' and 'struct acpi_handle_list')
   if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && tz->devices == devices) {
                                                                    ^

>
> And also "tz->devices = devices" below for that matter.
>

This change is ok.


>>                       memcpy(&tz->devices, &devices,
>>                               sizeof(struct acpi_handle_list));
>
> Rafael
>
>
> --
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux