On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 02:10:36AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:13:45PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Did the group conclude that the idea of FDT augmenting ACPI is not feasible ? > > I think expressing FDT in ACPI is feasible, I'm just not sure it's > desirable. We'd still end up with duplicate information and no mechanism > for drivers to handle both. > Not sure I understand what you are saying. My understanding of "augment" would be that there is ACPI information, and there is a separate FDT (or an FDT overlay) providing additional information. There should be no duplicate information in this model. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
