Re: [PATCH 3/6] acpi cleanup: Use pr_info() instead of printk() in arch/x86/mm/srat.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Joe,

On 08/16/2013 03:25 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 15:06 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
arch/x86/mm/srat.c

I think it'd be better to use pr_fmt
with the conversions to pr_info and pr_err.

pr_fmt can prefix the appropriate srat: and
so the format strings do not need it.

Something like:
---
  arch/x86/mm/srat.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat.c
index cdd0da9..350b4c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
   * are in one chunk. Holes between them will be included in the node.
   */

+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt

OK, will update the patches.

Thanks. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux