On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:22:11PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> 1) EDAC core needs to know that it should reject "hardware first"
> drivers.
-ENOPARSE. What do you mean?
> 3) If BIOS vendors add later some solution to enumerate the DIMMS
> per memory controller, channel, socket with APEI, the addition to the
> existing driver would be trivial.
Actually, with BIOS vendors wanting to do firmware-first strategy with
DRAM errors, they must have a pretty good and intimate picture of the
memory topology at hand. So it is only a logical consequence for them,
when reporting a memory error to the OS to tell us the silkscreen label
too, while at it.
And if they do that, we don't need the additional layer - just a
tracepoint from APEI and a userspace script.
It's a whole another question if they don't do that.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
