On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:13:37AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Yeah, if it's only used on one place, then it's fine. But if it gets
> used in other files, than those other files with have to define the
> macro as well.
Yeah, we need to be careful about this. When a ras tracepoint gets used
in multiple places, I'm guessing it would be cleaner/easier to fork it
out in its own ras-<a-lot-used-tracepoint>.h header, huh?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
