On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:36:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > No, it doesn't. And this patch-set can be merged first. > > OK, so if nobody objects, I can take patches [1,3-4/4], but I don't think I'm > the right maintainer to handle [2/4]. Given the dependencies, we'll probably need some coordination among trees. It spans across ACPI, memblock and x86. Maybe the best way to do it is applying the ACPI part to your tree, pulling the rest into a tip branch and then put everything else there. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
