On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 00:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 03:15:36 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 02:22 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > The following 5 patches clean up a little mess in acpi_bind_one() and > > > acpi_unbind_one(). They are on top of current linux-next plus the patch > > > at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2839101/ . > > > > > > [1/5] Move duplicated code from acpi_bind_one()/acpi_unbind_one() to a separate > > > function. > > > > I think the name of acpi_bind_physnode_name() is a bit confusing as if > > it would make some persistent binding. So, I'd suggest to rename it to > > acpi_set_physnode_name(). > > In fact, the plan was to make it mean "physical node name for acpi_bind", but > the execution was somewhat sloppy. ;-) > > I think I'll call it acpi_physnode_link_name(), that should be clear enough. Sounds good to me. Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
