On 08/02/2013 12:11 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 08/02/2013 07:34 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> Commit 1a7c618 (ACPI video: support _BQC/_BCL/_BCM methods that use
>>> index values) assumed that bl->levels were not reverted, but at this
>>> point they already are, so there's no need to revert them yet again.
>>
>> When acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level is called, bl->levels is not
>> reverted.
>
> This is the code that turns br->flags._BCL_reversed on:
>
> if (max_level == br->levels[2]) {
> br->flags._BCL_reversed = 1;
> sort(&br->levels[2], count - 2, sizeof(br->levels[2]),
> acpi_video_cmp_level, NULL);
> }
>
> Now tell me how br->flags._BCL_reversed can be on, and the br->levels
> *not* reverted.
Oh yes, it is reverted to be in increase order, so it is not in reverse
order. I'm a little confused by these words.
Please see acpi_video_bqc_quirk, we set _BQC_use_index by revert the
level on a reversed _BCL, so we will need to revert level here too.
-Aaron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
