On Monday, July 29, 2013 04:18:22 PM Ben Guthro wrote:
>
> On 07/29/2013 04:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, July 29, 2013 01:14:14 PM Ben Guthro wrote:
> >> Register for the extended sleep callback from acpi.
> >> As tboot currently does not support the reduced hardware sleep
> >> interface, fail this extended call.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: tboot-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: Gang Wei <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> >> index addf7b5..760f431 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> >> @@ -301,6 +301,17 @@ static int tboot_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control, u32 pm1b_control)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int tboot_extended_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32 val_b)
> >> +{
> >> + if (!tboot_enabled())
> >> + return 0;
> >> +
> >> + pr_warning("tboot is not able to suspend on platforms with"
> >> + " reduced hardware sleep (ACPIv5). Please contact"
> >> + " tboot-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list.");
> >> + return -1;
> >
> > Please use a meaningful error code here. For example -ENODEV.
>
> Would AE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED be more appropriate?
>
> include/acpi/acexcep.h:
> #define AE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED EXCEP_ENV (0x000E)
This is not an ACPI error. :-)
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
