Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ata: acpi: rework the ata acpi bind support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, July 26, 2013 09:37:09 AM Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 07/25/2013 10:52 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 01:47:03PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> Binding ACPI handle to SCSI device has several drawbacks, namely:
> >> 1 During ATA device initialization time, ACPI handle will be needed
> >>   while SCSI devices are not created yet. So each time ACPI handle is
> >>   needed, instead of retrieving the handle by ACPI_HANDLE macro,
> >>   a namespace scan is performed to find the handle for the corresponding
> >>   ATA device. This is inefficient, and also expose a restriction on
> >>   calling path not holding any lock.
> >> 2 The binding to SCSI device tree makes code complex, while at the same
> >>   time doesn't bring us any benefit. All ACPI handlings are still done
> >>   in ATA module, not in SCSI.
> >>
> >> Rework the ATA ACPI binding code to bind ACPI handle to ATA transport
> >> devices(ATA port and ATA device). The binding needs to be done only once,
> >> since the ATA transport devices do not go away with hotplug. And due to
> >> this, the flush_work call in hotplug handler for ATA bay is no longer
> >> needed.
> > 
> > I like it but am wondering why we weren't doing this before.  Was the
> > acpi support added before we made ata objects proper devices?
> 
> I think so. But since I didn't do the original binding, I can only guess
> :-)
> 
> At the time of the original binding, ACPI binding logic requires the
> binding device has a bus type, which these ATA transport devices don't
> have.
> 
> Later, the ACPI binding code evolves and no such limitation exists
> anymore. As you can see, we can simply set the ACPI handle before this
> device is added in driver core, and the binding will be done.

Yeah, we made that change in the ACPI core around 3.8 IIRC.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux