Re: [PATCH 11/21] x86: get pg_data_t's memory from other node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Tang.

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:52:53AM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> The node data should be on local, I agree with that. I'm not saying I
> won't do it. Just for now, it will be complicated to fix memory hot-remove
> path. So I think pushing this patch for now, and do the local node things
> in the next step.

I see.  As long as it's clearly noted in the patch description and as
comment && the behavior is off unless explicitly enabled, it should be
fine for now, I think.  As currently implemented, the users of memory
hotplug would have to pay pretty heavy price in terms of memory
locality overhead in general and it could be that the ones missed here
might not make noticeable difference anyway.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux