On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 12:30:45 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:19:04AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp.h
> > @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ struct acpiphp_context {
> > acpi_handle handle;
> > struct acpiphp_func *func;
> > struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge;
> > + bool handler_for_func:1;
>
> Hmm, should it be just plain:
>
> bool handler_for_func;
>
> ? What's the reason using bitfields for bool?
If there are more of them, they can be stored together in one int (they are
unsigned int under the hood).
I this particular case it doesn't matter and one of subsequent patches will
remove that field anyway. :-)
> > };
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
