On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 03:02:04PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> As an example, consider a hypothetical single-core Intel processor
> with Hyperthreading. On init, let's say the first cpu ends up owning
> banks 1, 2, 3 and 4; and the second cpu ends up owning banks 1 and
> 2. This would mean that MC banks 1 and 2 are "hyperthread"-specific,
> while banks 3 and 4 are shared. Now, if we offline the first cpu, it
> disables CMCI on all 4 banks.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is what I find strange - having to disable CMCI, especially on a
shared bank, just to reenable it right back on the next core. But I
guess this is a constraint dictated by the hardware...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
