Yes, we have an issue where the linux patch message sometimes needs "linux-specific" information. For the raw ACPICA commits, we do not have any os-specific details or references, for obvious reasons.
Not sure how to handle this. Lv can probably take a first pass at it, then I can review, before first release and general review.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zheng, Lv
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 5:42 PM
> To: Rafael J. Wysocki; Moore, Robert
> Cc: Len Brown; Wysocki, Rafael J; Brown, Len; linux acpi
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 13/16] ACPICA: Move _PRT repair into the standard
> complex repair module
>
> > > > No functional change. This change simply moves the repair code
> > > > from where it was originally implemented to the (more recent)
> > > > repair module
> > where it now belongs.
> > >
> > > OK, I'll apply this one with a fixed-up changelog.
> >
> > Applied now.
>
> Hi, Bob and Rafael,
>
> I'm out of the dialogue. I was working on other things.
>
> Thanks for doing so on PATCH 13-15 for me.
> I found them in the bleeding-edge branch of linux-pm repo.
>
> Many of the commit log issues are issues happened along with the release
> automation.
> I just played a monkey role in the release process with some committed
> tests performed.
> I agree it's a kind of policy issues. I will improve the release process
> continuously.
>
> Best regards
> -Lv
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
