Re: [PATCH v5 04/22] x86, ACPI: Search buffer above 4G in second try for acpi override tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 17:56 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Now we only search buffer for override acpi table under 4G.
> In some case, like user use memmap to exclude all low ram,
> we may not find range for it under 4G.
> 
> Do second try to search above 4G.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tested-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index 93e3194..42c48fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -627,6 +627,10 @@ void __init acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size)
>  	/* under 4G at first, then above 4G */
>  	acpi_tables_addr = memblock_find_in_range(0, (1ULL<<32) - 1,
>  					all_tables_size, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	if (!acpi_tables_addr)
> +		acpi_tables_addr = memblock_find_in_range(0,
> +					~(phys_addr_t)0,
> +					all_tables_size, PAGE_SIZE);

Should this search start from 4G, instead of 0?

Thanks,
-Toshi


>  	if (!acpi_tables_addr) {
>  		WARN_ON(1);
>  		return;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux