On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 00:31 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> On Sunday, June 09, 2013 07:01:38 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Drivers may need to make policy decisions based on the OS that the firmware
> > believes it's interacting with. ACPI firmware will make a series of _OSI
> > calls, starting from the oldest OS version they support and ending with the
> > most recent. Add a function to return the last successful call so that
> > drivers know what the firmware's expecting.
> >
> > Based on a patch by Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Bob (CCed) would prefer us to access acpi_gbl_osi_data directly instead of
> adding the wrapper to ACPICA. He also thinks that the symbol definitions
> should go into include/acpi/actypes.h rather than into acpixf.h.
>
> Then, the only ACPICA change would be to move the symbols and we can
> add a Linux-specific patch on top of that adding the acpi_gbl_osi_data
> wrapper.
That sounds good to me. Do you want to respin that, or should I send an
updated set?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
