RE: [PATCH 15/16] ACPICA: _CST repair: Handle null package entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This one is just adding additional checks on the _CST that are obvious errors in the AML. The eventual goal of the "repair" code in ACPICA is to never return a bad package from things like _CST. In other words, an AE_OK guarantees that the return value is usable. 

So, this is an additional implementation of this longer-range project.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: lenb417@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:lenb417@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Len Brown
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 11:00 AM
> To: Zheng, Lv
> Cc: Wysocki, Rafael J; Moore, Robert; Brown, Len; linux acpi
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] ACPICA: _CST repair: Handle null package
> entries
> 
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Sort package only after null/bad elements have been removed.
> > Lv Zheng.
> 
> 
> again, please explain WHY.
> 
> Every line of change to the kernel adds risk.
> I see no justification in this commit message why any risk should be added
> to the kernel.
> 
> Nacked-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux