On Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:29:54 AM Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2013-5-29 19:07, Martin Mokrejs wrote: > > Hanjun Guo wrote: > >> On 2013-5-29 7:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Thursday, May 23, 2013 08:44:26 PM Hanjun Guo wrote: > >>>> In acpi_processor_add(), get_cpu_device() will return NULL sometimes, > >>>> although the chances are small, I think it should be fixed. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> This patch isn't necessary any more after the changes queued up for 3.11 > >>> in the acpi-hotplug branch of the linux-pm.git tree. > >> > >> Ok, I noticed your patch set, just drop my patch. > > > > But shouldn't this go to stable at least? I checked linux-3.9.4 > > and it applies fine. Whether this is relevant for other stable > > series I will leave up to somebody else. ;) > > Hi Rafeal, > > What's your opinion on Martin's suggestion? Well, this is kind of hard to say. We generally don't apply patches to -stable that don't have mainline counterparts. Greg, I wonder what your opinion is? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
