On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:29:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 10:24 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >> > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:55:47AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > > This is the rest of patch series related to ACPI DMA helpers and Lynxpoint DMAC. >> > > Patches are rebased against current Linus' tree and Vinod's branch for-linus. >> > > >> > > Since v2: >> > > - remove patches that are already in the Vinod's tree >> > > - rebase on top of today's origin/master and Vinod's for-linus branch >> > > - fix description in patch 2/2 >> > Applied both, Thanks >> >> Thank you for applying them to next. >> >> I'm just wondering if you are going to send pull request soon to get >> them in the v3.10-rcX. > Nope these are in next & would show up in Linus's tree in next merge window. > Something which is not a bug fix doesnt get merged in rc's. You should know the > process Hmm... Now we have a situation when v3.9.x has support of Lynxpoint DMA, v3.10-rc2 has it broken. As far as I remember our discussion [1] we agreed to wait for v3.10-rc1 due to merge of linux-pm patches. For us it sounds like a regression. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/22/34 -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
