Re: ACPI v5 sleep registers broken on Toshiba laptops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bob,

What do you think about this?

Rafael


On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 09:39:12 AM Michael Marineau wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> On the recently released Toshiba Kirabook and kernels >= 3.4
> suspend/resume only works once. After resume input from things like
> the power button, brightness buttons, lid switch, etc. no longer work
> and the laptop simply hangs when suspended for a second time. This
> appears to also impact other recent Toshiba laptops (although the bug
> claims the hang is during the second resume rather than the second
> suspend as is my case).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1094800
> 
> Suspend/resume and all the buttons work just fine on v3.3. I bisected
> the v3.3->v3.4 change (with the help of patching in a kvm clock fix as
> needed) and tracked it down to this commit:
> 
> commit 2feec47d4c5f80b05f1650f5a24865718978eea4
> Author: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue Feb 14 15:00:53 2012 +0800
> 
>     ACPICA: ACPI 5: Support for new FADT SleepStatus, SleepControl registers
> 
>     Adds sleep and wake support for systems with these registers.
>     One new file, hwxfsleep.c
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Specifically, when the sleep status/control registeres are detected
> they are used instead of the traditional registers. The failure to
> resume a second time is triggered by this write in the new
> acpi_hw_extended_wake_prep function:
> 
>     status = acpi_get_sleep_type_data(ACPI_STATE_S0,
>                       &acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a,
>                       &acpi_gbl_sleep_type_b);
>     if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>         sleep_type_value =
>             ((acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a << ACPI_X_SLEEP_TYPE_POSITION) &
>              ACPI_X_SLEEP_TYPE_MASK);
> 
>         (void)acpi_write((u64)(sleep_type_value | ACPI_X_SLEEP_ENABLE),
>                  &acpi_gbl_FADT.sleep_control);
>     }
> 
> Replacing that write with the corresponding code from
> acpi_hw_legacy_wake_prep while leaving the other acpi_hw_extended_*
> functions alone gets suspend/resume working consistantly. That isn't
> quite enough as events don't seem to get re-enabled so acpi buttons
> and such don't work after resume. Copying the enable power button code
> from acpi_hw_legacy_wake to acpi_hw_extended_wake at least gets the
> power button back but lid, brightness, etc remain dead.
> 
> At the moment I've hacked these changes into v3.10.0-rc2 along with
> another hack to fix a video regression and it seems to behave
> reasonably well (minus the brightness keys and lid). I'm not sure what
> the apropriate fix is. Maybe find some way beyond their presence to
> detect if these registers are safe to use or just a device blacklist?




-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux