On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 21:31 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, May 03, 2013 12:27:54 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 14:05 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, May 02, 2013 05:20:12 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
:
> > One minor comment.
> >
> > +static __cpuinit int __acpi_processor_start(struct acpi_device *device)
> > > {
> > > - struct acpi_device *device = per_cpu(processor_device_array,
> > pr->id);
> > > + struct acpi_processor *pr = acpi_driver_data(device);
> > > + acpi_status status;
> > > int result = 0;
> > >
> > > + if (!pr)
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + if (pr->flags.need_hotplug_init)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> >
> > I felt the name of "need_hotplug_init" is a bit misleading since the
> > func actually skips when the need-flag is set. It may be nice to rename
> > it to defer_online_init, offline or something like that.
>
> I just wanted to avoid making too many non-essential changes in one patch.
> We can change the name of that field at any time later.
Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
