On Monday, April 22, 2013 01:07:39 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 03:14:47 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 22:06 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > >> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:05:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> > > > There is a patch series which introduces ACPI DMA helpers in similar way like > >> > > > we have for DeviceTree. > >> > > > > >> > > > In addition it applies this to the first user, namely dw_dmac driver. > >> > > Applied w/o 3 & 5.2 they failed, can you pls rebase and resend > >> > > > >> > > >> > Actually those two (at least 5/5) can't be applied on top of slave-dma. > >> > The patches requires slave-dma and linux-pm together. I heard it's > >> > usually achieved by creating a specific branch in one subsystem > >> > (linux-pm in our case) for another. > >> > > >> > Rafael, what could we do here? > >> > >> I suppose Vinod can pull from my acpi-lpss (which is guaranteed not to be > >> rebased at this point) and apply the series on top of that. > > Or I can wait for rc1 and apply afterwards...? > > Mika and I have no objections to go this way. That'd be fine by me too. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
