huang ying wrote: > Hi, Martin, > > Thanks for your test! > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Martin Mokrejs > <mmokrejs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Ying, >> >> huang ying wrote: >>> Hi, Martin, >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Martin Mokrejs >>> <mmokrejs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >>>>> If it doesn't make all of them go away, does it make *some* of them go away? >>>> >>>> Yes, repeated inserts and removals of devices into xHCI slot work fine, no need >>>> to use "lsusb -vv" to wakeup devices. >>>> >>>> Aside from some minor USB errors (won't mess them here) what is important is the fact >>>> that the eSATA card hotplug works well or perfectly. I just sent to you and other pci devs >>>> much more detailed report under the "Re: 3.9-rc1: pciehp and eSATA card SiI 3132, no XHCI" >>>> thread although this particular testing was done on 3.8.3. >>>> >>>> I think I can stop replying to this thread which is about the patch from Sarah. >>>> My dead XHCI port issue is a power management issue, incidentally also fixed by the >>>> very same patch from Huang Ying. Cool! ;-) >>> >>> Sorry, which patch do you mean? Or to be more clear, could you test >>> the patch attached? For the XHCI dead port issue? >> >> So I tested your port_dbg.patch on 3.8.3. Or did you want me to do it on 3.8.5? > > I think that is OK. Although my patch is against 3.9-rc4. > > I don't know why, but it appears that there is no any debug messages > that my patch will print in your dmesg. For example, in my patch, if > the PCIe port (1c.4) goes into suspended, there should be something as > follow in the dmesg: > > pcieport 0000:00:1c.4: ppri: will go suspend, is_hotplug_bridge: <0 or 1> > > Are you sure you send me the right dmesg? Or you use the right patch or kernel? Damn you are right, I forgot to apply it. Consider what I reported as vanilla 3.8.3 behavior. So it applies over 3.8.3 proving I forgot to run the patch command. :(( OK, will redo it with 3.8.5 so we stay close to 3.8.2 where I initially reported the xHCI dead port issue. And will open a bug at bugzilla.kernel.org. Martin P.S.: Per Rafael's request in another thread at http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=136491301104336&w=2 we might bring something from that back into linux-pci/acpi. Meanwhile, take that as a brief note how things are on 3.9-rc5. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
