Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Sarah Sharp >> >> Bjorn, I see that you're encouraging people to have their bugs and >> symptoms in a bug tracker. I've also been doing that within Intel, in a >> private JIRA issue tracker. I've been discussing if we can duplicate >> some bugs or features that don't contain Intel confidential information >> to a public JIRA at 01.org. I don't really want to use >> bugzilla.kernel.org because, quite frankly, the interface is archaic, >> and in the past I've gotten pushback from other devs about tracking >> "someday" features in there. > > My main concern is that often there's more information relevant to a > change than it makes sense to put in the changelog, so I like to > include a URL to that additional info. I don't really care if that's > for a mailing list archive, a bugzilla, a JIRA instance, etc. Issue > trackers are more convenient than mailing lists for collecting dmesg > logs, acpidumps, etc. The archaic bugzilla interface notwithstanding, > I'm not sure it would be an improvement to have a collection of dozens > of issue trackers controlled by random organizations. I'd rather have > a single place and confidence that it will stick around. What's wrong with bugzilla? It's nice and more appealing than Jira. From a user perspective I always found Jira ugly. sorry to say that. ;-) Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
