On Saturday, March 23, 2013 09:21:56 PM Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sat 2013-03-23 14:00:23, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Saturday, March 23, 2013 12:40:12 PM Pavel Machek wrote: > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> pavel@amd:~$ cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info > > >> present: yes > > >> design capacity: 0 mWh > > >> last full capacity: 0 mWh > > >> battery technology: rechargeable > > >> design voltage: 14400 mV > > >> > > >> This worked before... at least it works in 2.6 kernel used by debian. > > > > > > This works for me in 3.9-rc3. May I see your .config? > > > > Well, if this works, then maybe the Kconfig help text should be updated: > > > > config ACPI_PROCFS_POWER > > bool "Deprecated power /proc/acpi directories" > > depends on PROC_FS > > help > > For backwards compatibility, this option allows > > deprecated power /proc/acpi/ directories to exist, even when > > they have been replaced by functions in /sys. > > The deprecated directories (and their replacements) include: > > /proc/acpi/battery/* (/sys/class/power_supply/*) > > /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/* (sys/class/power_supply/*) > > This option has no effect on /proc/acpi/ directories > > and functions, which do not yet exist in /sys > > This option, together with the proc directories, will be > > deleted in 2.6.39. > > > > > > Time to call the bluff now :) > > This should probably be "default y", BTW. > > But problem is not in /proc, /sys has zeros, too. > > pavel@amd:~$ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/energy_full > 0 > pavel@amd:~$ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/energy_full_design > 0 > pavel@amd:~$ cat /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/model_name > 93P5030 > pavel@amd:~$ Can you narrow the time frame when it stopped working a bit? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html