Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI,acpi_memhotplug: Remove acpi_memory_info->failed bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Toshi,

2013/03/22 9:29, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 13:39 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
acpi_memory_info has enabled bit and failed bit for controlling memory
hotplug. But we don't need to keep both bits.

The patch removes acpi_memory_info->failed bit.

Signed-off-by: yasuaki ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

v2 : Changed a based kernel from linux-3.9-rc2 to linux-pm.git/bleeding-edge.

---
   drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   13 +------------
   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
index ea78988..597cd65 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ struct acpi_memory_info {
   	unsigned short caching;	/* memory cache attribute */
   	unsigned short write_protect;	/* memory read/write attribute */
   	unsigned int enabled:1;
-	unsigned int failed:1;
   };

   struct acpi_memory_device {
@@ -201,10 +200,8 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
   		 * returns -EEXIST. If add_memory() returns the other error, it
   		 * means that this memory block is not used by the kernel.
   		 */
-		if (result && result != -EEXIST) {
-			info->failed = 1;
+		if (result && result != -EEXIST)
   			continue;
-		}

   		info->enabled = 1;

@@ -238,15 +235,7 @@ static int acpi_memory_remove_memory(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
   	nid = acpi_get_node(mem_device->device->handle);

   	list_for_each_entry_safe(info, n, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
-		if (info->failed)
-			/* The kernel does not use this memory block */
-			continue;
-
   		if (!info->enabled)
-			/*
-			 * The kernel uses this memory block, but it may be not
-			 * managed by us.
-			 */
   			return -EBUSY;

Shouldn't this case (!info->enabled) continue since it is the same as
info->failed before?  -EBUSY was previously used for the -EEXIST case,
which is no longer a failure case with this patchset.

You are right. It is my mitake. We need to continue to hot remove memory.
I'll update soon.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu


Thanks,
-Toshi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux