[PATCH 2/2] ACPI / LPSS: make code less confusing for reader

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The excerpt like this:

	if (err) {
		err = 0;
		goto error_out;
	}

makes a reader confused even if it's commented. Let's do necessary actions and
return no error explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
index c695841..5d7ded2 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
@@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ static int acpi_lpss_create_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
 			 * Skip the device, but don't terminate the namespace
 			 * scan.
 			 */
-			ret = 0;
-			goto err_out;
+			kfree(pdata);
+			return 0;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.2.rc0.22.gb3600c3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux