On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +void __init x86_acpi_override_find(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long ramdisk_image, ramdisk_size;
> + unsigned char *p = NULL;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> + struct boot_params *boot_params_p;
> +
> + /*
> + * 32bit is from head_32.S, and it is 32bit flat mode.
> + * So need to use phys address to access global variables.
> + */
> + boot_params_p = (struct boot_params *)__pa_symbol(&boot_params);
> + ramdisk_image = get_ramdisk_image(boot_params_p);
> + ramdisk_size = get_ramdisk_size(boot_params_p);
> + p = (unsigned char *)ramdisk_image;
> + acpi_initrd_override_find(p, ramdisk_size, true);
> +#else
> + ramdisk_image = get_ramdisk_image(&boot_params);
> + ramdisk_size = get_ramdisk_size(&boot_params);
> + if (ramdisk_image)
> + p = __va(ramdisk_image);
> + acpi_initrd_override_find(p, ramdisk_size, false);
> +#endif
> +}
> +#endif
What is preventing us from making the 64-bit variant also work in flat
mode to make the code consistent and not hiding the differences under
the rug? What am I missing here?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
