Re: [PATCH 01/14] x86, ACPI, mm: Kill max_low_pfn_mapped

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/07/2013 09:28 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> They are not using memblock_find_in_range(), so 1ULL<< will not help.
>>
>> Really hope i915 drm guys could clean that hacks.
> 
> The code isn't being used.  Just leave it alone.  Maybe add a comment.
>  The change is just making things more confusing.
> 

Indeed, but...

Daniel: can you guys clean this up or can we just remove the #if 0 clause?

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux