Re: [PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: fix potential suspend blocking issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/05, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
>>
>> @@ -2462,13 +2462,13 @@ static int hotkey_kthread(void *data)
>>       unsigned int poll_freq;
>>       bool was_frozen;
>>
>> +     set_freezable();
>> +
>>       mutex_lock(&hotkey_thread_mutex);
>>
>>       if (tpacpi_lifecycle == TPACPI_LIFE_EXITING)
>>               goto exit;
>>
>> -     set_freezable();
>> -
>
> I don't understand this code... but don't we have the same problem
> with kthread_freezable_should_stop() below? It can call __refrigerator()
> too under the same lock.
>

I don't think the lock is held at that point. There is an unlock right
before entering the while loop and at the bottom of the loop.

> Oleg.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux