在 2013-02-19二的 23:00 -0800，David Rientjes写道： > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote: > > > Yes, I know there's no new changes in my patch as I said before(not > > based on lasted), but as I try to apply my patch(1/4), it will do > > the right work to move current srat.c from arch/x86/mm/ to > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/ regardless of what I based is not latest. > > > > Sorry, but that makes no sense. Your patch cannot be used cleanly if > there have been subsequent changes to a hunk prior to applying it -- in > this case the hunk would be the entire file since you're removing it. > > These patches would also be pushed by the x86 maintainers, who are not > cc'd on this patch, and I think it would be unfair to ask them to make up > for your inability to generate a bleeding edge patch with linux-next. The > changes already cited in this thread have been in linux-next for almost > two weeks, yet you refuse to rebase on top of them. OK, I'd like to rebase, Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
