On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 09:50 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Hi Toshi,
>
> 2013/02/07 7:50, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > Changed sysfs eject, acpi_eject_store(), to support ACPI scan handlers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index cfd7a69..3ff632e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ acpi_eject_store(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > #ifndef FORCE_EJECT
>
> > - if (acpi_device->driver == NULL) {
> > + if (!acpi_device->driver && !acpi_device->handler) {
>
> I don't understand the fix.
>
> The if sentence becomes true, when both acpi_device->driver and acpi_device->handler
> are NULL. It means that acpi_eject_store() runs if either acpi_device->driver or
> acpi_device->handler has pointer. Is it O.K.?
Yes.
> I think it should be if (!acpi_device->driver || !acpi_device->handler).
No, the condition has to be "&&" because an acpi_device is _either_
bound to an ACPI driver or an ACPI scan handler.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
