On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:39:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 11:07:28 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 02:26:26PM +0800, Lv Zheng wrote: > > > This patch enables ACPI power domain on UART user devices. With this > > > patch, Linux can achieve open/close based ACPI power manageability for > > > UART tty ports. > > > > So you are going to be sticking acpi_* calls into common core places all > > over the kernel for stuff like this? > > > > What's wrong with using the existing pm callbacks that are there for all > > platforms to use? > > I think that this just hasn't been thought through sufficiently (again). Ugh. Ok, I now am going to just quietly drop all intel.com patches to the tty/serial layer unless they have at least 2 signed-off-by: lines, one of which is by someone who is "well known" to me as being sane. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
