2013/02/05 11:37, liguang wrote:
> acpi_numa is used to prevent srat table
> being parsed, seems a little miss-named,
> if 'noacpi' was specified by cmdline and
> CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA was enabled, acpi_numa
> will be operated directly from everywhere
> it needed to disable/enable numa in acpi
> mode which was a bad thing, so, try to
> export a fuction to get srat table
> enable/disable info.
The patch is wrong.
By the patch, acpi_numa is set to one of three values, either -1, false(0), 1.
By this, x86_acpi_numa_init() goes wrong.
How about using bool to acpi_numa?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> Reviewed-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> index 0c44630..6b9c861 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static inline void disable_acpi(void) { }
> #define ARCH_HAS_POWER_INIT 1
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> -extern int acpi_numa;
> +extern void disable_acpi_numa(void);
> extern int x86_acpi_numa_init(void);
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c
> index 4ddf497..0a4d7ee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c
> @@ -24,22 +24,27 @@
> #include <asm/apic.h>
> #include <asm/uv/uv.h>
>
> -int acpi_numa __initdata;
> +static bool acpi_numa __initdata;
>
> static __init int setup_node(int pxm)
> {
> return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
> }
>
> -static __init void bad_srat(void)
> +void __init disable_acpi_numa(void)
> +{
> + acpi_numa = false;
> +}
> +
> +static void __init bad_srat(void)
> {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT not used.\n");
> acpi_numa = -1;
> + printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT will not be used.\n");
> }
>
> -static __init inline int srat_disabled(void)
> +static bool __init srat_disabled(void)
> {
> - return acpi_numa < 0;
> + return acpi_numa;
> }
>
> /* Callback for SLIT parsing */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index 2d125be..870ca6b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static __init int numa_setup(char *opt)
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> if (!strncmp(opt, "noacpi", 6))
> - acpi_numa = -1;
> + disable_acpi_numa();
> #endif
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index 138e566..a5f6353 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
> * any NUMA information the kernel tries to get from ACPI will
> * be meaningless. Prevent it from trying.
> */
> - acpi_numa = -1;
> + disable_acpi_numa();
> #endif
>
> /* Don't do the full vcpu_info placement stuff until we have a
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
