On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 02:24:27 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 23:04 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used > > by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver > > through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device > > object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver > > .remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for the clean-up! It looks good. > > Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> Thanks! Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
