Hi Alan, On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote: >> > closed. Do we want to drop support for that kind of behavior? >> >> I don't think we should drop such support. >> And the safest way to avoid such break is we refine the suspend >> condition for ODD, and using what ZPODD defined condition isn't that >> bad to me: >> - for tray type, no media inside and tray close; >> - for slot type, no media inside. >> While whether tray is closed or not may not be that important, but at >> least we should make sure there is no media inside. >> >> Thoughts? > > That sounds reasonable to me, at least as a first step. If people want > their CD drive to suspend, they can eject the disc. Stupid question: does the kernel know if a CD has audio tracks? (I'm assuming that nobody will access a data track without mounting it or holding the device open) Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
