On Friday, January 04, 2013 04:03:01 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >> struct pci_sysdata {
> >> int domain; /* PCI domain */
> >> int node; /* NUMA node */
> >> + void *acpi_handle;
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> >> void *iommu; /* IOMMU private data */
> >> #endif
> >>
>
> acpi_handle is not good name and it is confusing.
Well, what would be a better name in your opinion?
I was going to put that into a #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI / #endif, so what about
calling it acpi_data?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
