On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 11:40:47 PM Lekensteyn wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 19 December 2012 12:31:35 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This is a well-aimed shot in the dark based on the DSDT I see. > > > > Can you post that DSDT by chance? > The DSDT for a Lenovo Ideapad Y470 has been posted before to > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42696. > > From dsdt.dsl, > line 9279 (context Device(\_SB.PCI0.PEG0)): > > Name (_ADR, 0x00010000) > > line 9377 (context Device(\_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP)): > > Name (_ADR, 0xFFFF) > > line 9414 (context Device(\_SB.PCI0.PEG0.VGA)): > Name (_ADR, Zero) > > From ssdt6.dsl, line 1070, (context Device(\_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP)): > Method (_INI, 0, NotSerialized) > { > Store (Zero, \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP._ADR) > } > OK But as far as I can say, there also are _PS0, _PS1 and _PS3 methods under PEG0.VGA and there are display devices under it. Moreover, it seems to have _DOS defined (which PEGP doesn't have), so I'm not really sure we should prefer PEG0.PEGP to PEG0.VGA after all? I wonder what PEG0.PEGP and PEG0.VGA are supposed to represent, actually. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
