On Sunday, December 16, 2012 09:36:49 AM Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > This series is on top of the one I sent on Thursday: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/13/632 > > > > It goes one step farther and makes some simplifications that become possible > > after applying that patchset. > > > > [1/6] Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add() > > [2/6] Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start() > > [3/6] Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used > > [4/6] Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() > > [5/6] Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag > > [6/6] Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument > > > > It survives booting on Toshiba Portege R500 without any visible issues. > > Do you have git branch that i could test? There you go: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git acpi-scan-temp > I'd like to rebase for-pci-root-bus-hotplug patches, so what should be base? I'll need to talk about that with Bjorn. Hopefully he'll be reachable tomorrow. > It would be hard for me to base on your acpi tree and Bjorn's pci tree. We'll work out something. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
