Hi Rafael, I have worked out a patch set to clean up ACPI/PCI related notifications, please refer to http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg17822.html The patchset doesn't apply cleanly to Bjorn's latest pci-next tree. I will help to rebase it if needed. Regards! Gerry On 12/11/2012 10:26 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> OK, thanks for the pointers. I actually see more differences between our >>> patchsets. For one example, you seem to have left the parent->ops.bind() >>> stuff in acpi_add_single_object() which calls it even drivers_autoprobe is >>> set. >> >> Sorry, that should have been "which calls it even when drivers_autoprobe is >> not set". I need to be more careful. >> > > oh, Jiang Liu had one patch to remove that workaround. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git;a=commitdiff;h=b40dba80c2b8395570d8357e6b3f417c27c84504 > > ACPI/pci-bind: remove bind/unbind callbacks from acpi_device_ops > > Maybe you can review that patches in my for-pci-next2... > those are ACPI related anyway. > > those patches have been there for a while, and Bjorn did not have time > to digest them. > > or you prefer I resend updated version as huge whole patchset? > > Thanks > > Yinghai > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
