Re: [PATCH] ACPI : do not use Lid and Sleep button for S5 wakeup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:06:46 +0800, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote :

> On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 01:02 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, December 03, 2012 04:15:06 PM Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > From 3e7b4da3783d200f35568f72b3b25f16df546ffe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:35:43 +0800
> > > Subject: [PATCH] ACPI : do not use Lid and Sleep button for S5 wakeup
> > > 
> > > When system enters power off, the _PSW of Lid device is enabled.  
> > > But this may cause the system to reboot instead of power off.
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35262
> > > 
> > > A proper way to fix this is to always disable lid wakeup capability
> > > for S5.
> > 
> > While I understand the motivation, quite frankly I don't understand the patch. :-)
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/acpi/scan.c |    7 ++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > > index d1ecca2..f20020a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > > @@ -807,8 +807,8 @@ acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(acpi_handle handle,
> > >  static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct acpi_device_id button_device_ids[] = {
> > > -		{"PNP0C0D", 0},
> > >  		{"PNP0C0C", 0},
> > > +		{"PNP0C0D", 0},
> > >  		{"PNP0C0E", 0},
> > >  		{"", 0},
> > >  	};
> > > @@ -820,6 +820,11 @@ static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
> > >  	/* Power button, Lid switch always enable wakeup */
> > >  	if (!acpi_match_device_ids(device, button_device_ids)) {
> > >  		device->wakeup.flags.run_wake = 1;
> > > +		if (!acpi_match_device_ids(device, &button_device_ids[1])) {
> > > +			/* Do not use Lid/sleep button for S5 wakeup */
> > > +			if (device->wakeup.gpe_number == 5)
> > > +				device->wakeup.gpe_number = 4;
> > 
> > Why do you want to change the wakeup GPE number for those devices?  It appears
> > to be based on some extra knowledge that should be documented.
> > 
> > Moreover, this doesn't look like the right thing to do anyway.  Shouldn't we
> > just change device->wakeup.sleep_state to ACPI_STATE_S4 (if it was S5) instead?
> 
> oops, this is really embarrassing.
> I made a stupid mistake in this patch, and you are right that I was
> trying to override the device->wakeup.sleep_state to ACPI_STATE_S4.
> 
> refreshed patch attached.
> Patch has been test by faking a lid device in custom DSDT table.
> But I still prefer to get the test result in the bug report,
> before pushing it upstream.
> 
> From 64e16e442b7d33801b5c1a41cf5c87d4d8ff1e10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:35:43 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI : do not use Lid and Sleep button for S5 wakeup
> 
> When system enters power off, the _PSW of Lid device is enabled.  
> But this may cause the system to reboot instead of power off.
> 
> A proper way to fix this is to always disable lid wakeup capability for S5.
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35262
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>

It works ! (On a Toshiba C870-12N, which exhibits the problem).

Tested-by: Anisse Astier <anisse@xxxxxxxxx>


> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c |    7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index d1ecca2..35674c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -807,8 +807,8 @@ acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(acpi_handle handle,
>  static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_device_id button_device_ids[] = {
> -		{"PNP0C0D", 0},
>  		{"PNP0C0C", 0},
> +		{"PNP0C0D", 0},
>  		{"PNP0C0E", 0},
>  		{"", 0},
>  	};

Why do you need to change the device order ? Is just cosmetic ?
(alphabetical)

> @@ -820,6 +820,11 @@ static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
>  	/* Power button, Lid switch always enable wakeup */
>  	if (!acpi_match_device_ids(device, button_device_ids)) {
>  		device->wakeup.flags.run_wake = 1;
> +		if (!acpi_match_device_ids(device, &button_device_ids[1])) {
> +			/* Do not use Lid/sleep button for S5 wakeup */
> +			if (device->wakeup.sleep_state == ACPI_STATE_S5)
> +				device->wakeup.sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S4;
> +		}
>  		device_set_wakeup_capable(&device->dev, true);
>  		return;
>  	}

What if someone wants to use power-on with LID ? Is it an accepted use
case ?


Regards,

Anisse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux